Saturday, May 22, 2010

battlefield city

Battlefield city
By: Shamim-ur-Rahman

Internecine political battles are making Karachi a dangerous place to live




A new extremism has developed in Pakistan’s economic hub, Karachi, a city that is increasingly serving as a safe haven for extremist groups backed by criminal mafias and certain political elements. The reported arrest of a top Taliban leader, Mulla Abdul Ghani Baradar, from the outskirts of Karachi in mid-February has only made this new dynamic clearer, and more ominous. The arrest not only proved that the network of al-Qaeda- and Taliban-linked fighters is well-entrenched and active across the north-south length of Pakistan; but the joint operation, conducted by Pakistan and American intelligence operatives, also sent a message that Pakistan might no longer be the safe haven that it once was. However, if the government fails to address ‘bread and butter’ issues – providing employment, controlling inflation and ensuring the availability of essential items – and the political parties continue to fight among themselves for narrow vested interests, the Taliban could still spring a surprise. If this happened, it would most likely be with the support of the sizeable fundamentalist-minded and generally disgruntled segments of Pakistani society.

The sheer number, scale and consistency of the attacks on Karachi are all adding to the worries of already disoriented city citizens. From October 2009 through mid-February, about 200 people have been killed in both politically motivated targeted killings and extremist blasts in various parts of Karachi, while several hundred more have been injured. Alongside, billions of rupees have been lost due to looting, arson and the closure of businesses during strikes that have been called by various political parties to highlight the lack of security. Yet while extremist attacks are getting much of the headlines and anger, the city has been under particular pressure due to the targeted killing of activists aligned with various political outfits – the Sindh-based Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) of the late Benazir Bhutto, the Pashtun-dominated Awami National Party (ANP), the sectarian Sunni Tehrik, the Islamist Jamaat-i-Islami and others. Incredibly, even as the violence mounts, the MQM, PPP and ANP technically remain in a coalition government together.

Most of the time, these assassinations are being carried out by workers aligned with one or the other of these parties. But after each spell of killings, as a response to public outrage, the parties have shifted the blame away from themselves, placing it instead on the ‘land mafia’ and other criminal elements. There is little attempt at introspection and weeding out violent elements from within their own rank and file. Of course, it has come as a shock to many that the three coalition partners in Sindh and in the federal government have been accused of involvement in the recent wave of violence and killings in Karachi, endangering, in addition to public safety, the survival of their own government in Sindh. It is no exaggeration to say that, with the cadre of all three heavily armed and trained in the use of firearms, clashes between the party workers now threaten to plunge the city into a prolonged bloodbath.

Complicating matters further, criminal elements are offering significant assistance to the extremists. Drug money and funds collected by the criminal mafia and extremists are being used to make inroads into various political and religious parties, which need funds to advance their political agendas. For instance, according to senior government officials, both the MQM and the ANP have dons at their behest extorting money, kidnapping for ransom and robbing banks, though both parties have dismissed such charges. Speaking on condition of anonymity, some Western intelligence operatives allege that some of these elements are enjoying the protection of those in the country’s establishment. This view is generally derived from the oft-repeated American reports that Islamabad might be sheltering Taliban fighters in the tribal areas bordering Afghanistan.

Pakistani authorities have vehemently rejected such allegations, however, pointing to the manner in which, in recent months, the Pakistan military had gone into Swat and Waziristan to carry out attacks on militant strongholds. Pakistani authorities insist that most of the militants operating in Pakistan’s tribal areas are actually receiving funds and weapons from the Indian and Israeli agencies, purportedly as part of an ongoing proxy war via Afghanistan. Yet while Pakistani authorities claim to have evidence of Indian involvement in the attacks, they have yet to provide any credible evidence.

Bad for business
While the network of al-Qaeda and Taliban operatives is clearly active in Pakistan today, the apprehension that they will take over Karachi is misplaced. Currently, such scaremongering is being used by MQM sloganeers, evidently in a bid to attract Western support for assistance in easing out much of Karachi’s Pashtun community, who the muhajirs of the MQM view as posing a serious challenge to the party’s longstanding political control over the city. In the past, the MQM and Pashtun have fought ethnically motivated battles on the streets of Karachi, in which certain segments of the security agencies have played an important role. Most importantly, the Pashtun are politically divided between the ANP, the Jamaat-i-Islami and the Jamiat Ulema Islam, while offering almost no support to the MQM.

Critics of the MQM maintain that the party is deliberately using the bogey of Talibanisation to distract attention from its attempts to gain control of more land in the city (see Himal July 2009, “Capturing Karachi”). The MQM deputy convener, Farooq Sattar, has made the accusation that “large numbers of Waziris and Mehsuds fleeing operations in Pakistan’s insurgency-hit tribal areas are settling down in Karachi, undermining the security environment of the city.” Sattar says this anxiety on the part of the MQM has increased significantly over the past year, as tens of thousands of Pashtun have fled the fighting in Swat and Waziristan and arrived in Karachi. As a result, the ANP has suddenly gained strength in the metropolis. There are significant economics at stake, too, with the influx having implications for the hot commodity of Karachi real estate. Activists of all Sindhi political parties are involved in land-grabbing, and the MQM has long been one of the most powerful in this regard. But the growing Pashtun community has led to a strengthened ANP, which evidently is now cutting into what the MQM sees as its ‘business’.

Meanwhile, the MQM has long used its clout over the now-dissolved local-bodies system of the city district government, which completed its four-year term in October 2009 but was given an extension until 31 December. Pashtuns who ave settled in Karachi, as well as the ANP, are now demanding more representation on the ground. Thus, many now believe the appalling law-and-order situation in Karachi to be a direct result of MQM attempts to re-enforce the party’s political and administrative control of the city, in the face of the ANP challenge. The warnings of a ‘growing’ Talibanisation represent a potent card, given the significant support for the ANP that comes from the Pashtun community, accused of harbouring Taliban fighters.

At this critical junction, the provincial government has expressed its determination to restore law and order in Karachi. In this context, it has called upon the police and paramilitary Rangers to use “ruthlessness”, and to shoot suspected extremists on sight. But all the while, the trust deficit between the political parties in Sindh is growing to a dangerous peak. Amidst the burgeoning volcano, one cannot rule out the possibility of a collapse of the PPP-MQM alliance during the upcoming local elections. Given the trends of recent months, such a turn of events would be politically catastrophic, plunging the city into a cycle of violence that could resemble the volatile times of the early 1990s.


(Published in HIMAL SouthAsian's March 2010 issue)

Shamim-ur-Rahman is a journalist in Karachi.

Waiting for the Crocodiles

Waiting for the Crocodiles

By Shamim-ur-Rahman

While Pakistan is pressing ahead with initiatives for infrastructure development in the Thar Desert for extracting coal reserves for meeting energy needs of the country, Pakistan Navy is beefing up its defence in the creeks along the Indian border and other coastal areas because the weapons acquisition by the Indian navy following Mumbai terrorist attack was aimed at offensive operations.

Pleading for providing more tactical equipment –such as UAVs, night vision devices and high speed boats to deal with the threat-- Commander Coast, Pakistan Navy Rear Admiral Tayab Ali Dogar recently told me that the Indians were investing a lot in weapons for littoral warfare and brown water navy.
“They have interceptor boats which are very high speed which will be used for interdiction in our area. They are also equipped with UAVs. There is lot of surveillance equipment which will go to UAVs. Midgets are also in their inventory.
“This makes us apprehensive that in the garb of defensive operations they are actually aiming for offensive operations. In view of that we are beefing up our defences. Our knowledge of geography of the area is a big plus for us. But it has to be backed up with lot of equipment,” Admiral Dogar said.
“Navy is trying to get more hovercraft, more weapons and night vision devices so that the force is able to monitor any Indian Marine Commandos (Marcos) and Crocodile Force operations because most of their operations would take place at night.
To a question he said “certainly we need more platforms; we need UAVs for tracking of our fishermen on the Makran Coast; we need them for night patrolling in the Creeks area. They can be equipped with infrared and night vision devices so that any ingress in the area can be countered”.
While plans in this regard have been sent to NHQ for budgetary allocation, Commander Coast was banking on the knowledge of the area and force presence for tackling anybody with “ulterior motives”.
Several large creeks like Sir Creek, Pir Sanai Creek, Pabewari Creek, Vianwari Creek, Koori Creek and Deveri Creek in the region besides numerous drains in the area including the 'Harami Nallah’ (Harami doro) are vulnerable to infiltration. Sir Creek remains a bone of contention between Pakistan and India.
It may be pointed out that during Gen Ziaul Haq’s time the regime had reported lot of ingress of militant outfits through these creeks including that of Al Zulfikar Organization (AZO) activists, alleged to be the armed group formed by the Murtaza Bhutto, son of Pakistan’s former Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who was hanged by the military regime of General Ziaul Haq, That was the time when Pakistani force started physical presence in the creek area of which 75 per cent is in Pakistan’s jurisdiction and 25 percent is on the Indian side.

He drew my attention to the fact that the Gujarat Frontier of BSF has been raising the Crocodile force or Sagar Parharibal on the lines of the elite Marcos of the Indian Navy for effective security along the creek area.`
There is a separate force that is called Marcos (Marine Commandos). They have planned to raise it to about 2500. Darhiwala force, as they are often called, forms a special/covert operations and counter-terrorism unit specializing in sea-based land warfare. Also, they provide support to Indian Army units in specialized areas, such as in occupied Jammu and Kashmir's Wular Lake. The Indian Army maintains the 340 Independent Infantry Brigade (Amphibious) subordinate to 12 Corps (Jodhpur, Rajasthan) of the South Western Command

In view of the evolving threat Commander Coast emphasized the need for integrated response of all the government agencies to all security related issues. He said that Pakistan navy has sent a proposal of a joint maritime security organization in which the Navy will coordinate security related work of the agencies like Karachi Port, Bin Qasim Port, Gwadar Port, and the MSA, Coast Guards, Fisheries, Customs and all such agencies. It will be a sort of Ops room; he said adding that the proposal has been sent to the ministry of Defense.
Asked what protection his force can provide to Pakistani fishermen especially when the Indians are determined to operate more aggressively in the area Admiral Dogar said “nobody will bother them as long as they remain in our international waters. The problem arises when some of them get lost, for whatever reasons, and cross on the other side of the border. He nevertheless reiterated the determination to give a daunting blow to the adversary.
Replying to a question he said that work on data bank of the fishing boats has started with the help of Maritime Security Agency with focus on the established landing points like Karachi, Gawadar, Ormara, Pasni etc. Since there was no authentic data of boats since 1947, due to absence yearly renewal, the process of re-registering them was started and it was also on the agenda of National Maritime Affairs Coordinating Committee (NMACC). There will be periodic registration for which the Navy and MSA are assisting the Fisheries and Ports and shipping departments.